Am 09.11.2005 um 13:57 schrieb Bob.Cowdery at CGI-Europe.com:
> Bert wrote:
>
> > Missing class comments are indeed a problem. However, code
> > documentation generally is deemed less necessary, since Smalltalk
> > itself is rather verbose compared to other programming languages. In
> > addition, unit tests are seen as a good way to both document and
> > verify behavior. Like, in EventTest, you see many examples of how  
> you
> > can use events.
>
> Ok, rant over, it was trivial and does exactly what I want. Is  
> there some way to know there is a test class or does one rely on a  
> naming convention like System-Object Events-Tests in this case.
This, and "senders of" :-) It will also show uses in test classes.
> > Btw, it would be nice if you stop sending HTML mails to the list  
> - we
> > prefer plain text.
>
> I will try and remember
But your message was HTML again ;-)

- Bert -