On 4-Oct-05, at 8:47 AM, Ken Causey wrote:

> On Tue, 2005-10-04 at 14:21 +0200, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>
>> Am 04.10.2005 um 02:40 schrieb tim Rowledge:
>>
>>
>>> Since the Mantis report is closed and I can't see how to open it
>>> again [...]
>>>
>>
>> I think simply adding a note to a closed issue will re-open it.
>>
>> - Bert -
>>
>>
>
> Actually, I don't think Tim is even being offered the opportunity  
> to add
> a note.  I've had this reported before that the 'Add Note' section
> doesn't appear for anyone below Manager (Developer?) level once an  
> issue
> has been closed.

That seems to be the case - I did try to add a note but to no avail.

>
> Actually in my opinion it's probably not the best idea to reopen issue
> 854.  It has gone through it's full cycle including Stephane having
> harvested it just 2 days ago.  I think it would be confusing to  
> start it
> over again.  At this point I think Tim would need to provide a
> changeset/mcz to replace the already harvested fixes and that  
> should be
> submitted as a new issue and that new issue should be marked as  
> related
> to 854.
I concur. I'll open a new report and include the simple suggestion  
first before worrying about replacing code. I've found some other  
places in the Delay code that seem to need tweaking as well.


tim
-- 
tim Rowledge; tim at rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim