updates vs. images -- limiting squeak to code

Cees De Groot cdegroot at gmail.com
Thu Oct 13 15:46:07 UTC 2005


Hi Josh, long time no speak :)

On 10/13/05, Josh Gargus <schwa at fastmail.us> wrote:
> Come on now, (I believe that) it is those Squeak users who have the
> most non-code objects (eg: those using it as an expressive medium,
> not a programming environment) who are least likely to be able to
> write such code.

Apart from the (large) group of Squeaklanders, is there a substantial
enough group of Squeak users who don't code themselves to warrant
putting a significant load on the shoulders of a couple of volunteers?

Note that I'm *not* argumentative here, just trying to get lots of pro
and contra arguments on the table.



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list