Need to do something
stéphane ducasse
ducasse at iam.unibe.ch
Sun Oct 16 09:11:45 UTC 2005
On 14 oct. 05, at 22:18, Andreas Raab wrote:
> Ah, now there is a concept: "Improvement". My whole bitching about
> what has done to the chess game comes down to the point that in my
> view, not a single one of these changes were improvements. Now, the
> question is: Can a maintainer (before you go into this, I am NOT
> claiming to be a maintainer for the chess game, this is a
> theoretical question) say that he doesn't want some global replace
> of "foo at: 1" with "foo first" and will still be considered
> responsible, or do you have to take whatever is thrown at you? In
> reality, the ability to decide what consitutes an improvement and
> what not is probably the strongest expression of ownership in that
> code.
sure if you are the maintainer you should be able to have control.
Else other people simply fork your code
if they are not happy with it.
Stef
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|