Ron,

This is great, thank you!

Where we need to start here though is in defining what you see yourself
(your team) being responsible for.  The issue is that there is no
current Cryptography PackageInfo defining the classes that would come
under that definition.  Also there is already an SM package with this
name.  The image itself contains at least a few Crypto related classes
like DigitalSignatureAlgorithm, SecureHashAlgorithm, etc.  The SM
package is distince from this and includes many other classes.

What we are really asking for here is maintainers for the code in the
image.  That doesn't necessarily mean that you can't adopt an external
package like Cryptography, but that doesn't (I don't think) come under
the 'Need to do something' category.

At any rate what I'm asking here, first of all, is simply a clear
definition from you as to what you see such a team covering?

Ken

On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 11:37 -0400, Ron Teitelbaum wrote:
> Göran,
> 
> 	I volunteer to maintain Cryptography. 
> 
> Ron
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cees De Groot [mailto:cdegroot at gmail.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 11:27 AM
> To: Ron at usmedrec.com; The general-purpose Squeak developers list
> Subject: Re: Need to do something
> 
> Well, number 2) of course ;)
> 
> On 10/19/05, Ron Teitelbaum <Ron at usmedrec.com> wrote:
> > So what do you suggest?
> >
> > 1) Email everyone that has ever touched the package?
> > 2) Volunteer to maintain the package myself?
> > 3) I posted the class to Mantis( http://bugs.impara.de/view.php?id=2086 ),
> > should I just assume that that is good enough?
> > 4) Forget it and keep the changes to myself?
> 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20051019/d50105b5/attachment.pgp