Actually doing something!

Cees De Groot cdegroot at gmail.com
Wed Oct 19 19:39:22 UTC 2005


Well, 2 solutions: either it really belongs to the kernel but is a
separate (knowledge) domain, this could warrant some sort of subgroup
concentrating on that, or it doesn't belong to the kernel so should
move to it's own 'top-level' PackageInfo and get a team to deal with
it...

On 10/19/05, Ken Causey <ken at kencausey.com> wrote:
> There's Kernel-Chronology.  That's not currently split out from Kernel
> but probably should be.  The current packaging scheme has all of Kernel
> in a single package.  The question then is how to go about splitting
> this out to allow a team to handle it.
>
> Ken
>
> On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 20:23 +0200, Brent Pinkney wrote:
> > Goran,
> >
> > If the Chronology package is a pachage, sign me up (again) as I wrote most
> > of it and all of the tests.
> >
> > There are a number of wee cleanups and enhancements pending for 3.9 that I
> > would like to close.
> >
> > Brent
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQBDVpY2//qOUj3eKgMRAqwFAJ9sa1UynS35m91Sz39b1Pk40ie/lACfURYV
> G32VV6R8nwBE1uX/kMz/ZpM=
> =8OG2
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
>
>
>



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list