Distributed Objects

Alan Grimes alangrimes at starpower.net
Sat Sep 3 02:47:20 UTC 2005


Michaël Piel wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> We have planned to make a distributed computing project and we want to use distributed objects in Squeak.
> 
> I am currently making a synthesis and an evaluation of a few frameworks by comparing them with 
>various criterions. We imperatively need high-level distributed
objects, like
>"Distributed Smalltalk" for VisualWorks but in Squeak, and not just
"sockets".

> Here is the list of the frameworks we are testing :
> - rST (Remote SmallTalk)
> - RMT (Remote Messaging Toolkit)
> - OperaORB-native
> - Ma Client Server

> I would like to know if there are other frameworks which could satisfy these criterions.

Interesting, since paralellizing the VM is not practicable in the near
term, I was looking into opportunities for factoring the functionality
of the image into paralell, possibly distributed sub-systems. This has a
number of drawbacks next to transparent multithreading, but shouldn't be
quite as challenging on the implementation side... (the changes to the
VM code are more superficial...)

Could you provide links to the frameworks you mentioned above?


-- 
Friends don't let friends use GCC 3.4.4
GCC 3.3.6 produces code that's twice as fast on x86!

http://users.rcn.com/alangrimes/



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list