Hi bryce

can you explain to me what is the squeak part of Exupery?
You have your own compiler? bytecode emitter?
Did you base it on fullClosure/ RB AST?

Stef

On 2 sept. 05, at 21:56, Bryce Kampjes wrote:


> stéphane ducasse writes:
>
>
>> Hi bryce
>>
>> How would you see the integration of your work with the rest?
>> Especially the VM maker guys.
>>
>>
>
> The first step will be making Exupery useful for a small group of
> people. Until then, the risk of needing more VM changes is too
> great. The standard VM's are not the place to experiment in. Once
> we're confident that the VM isn't going to need further changes to
> make Exupery useful then merging will make sense. I'm not there yet.
>
> I've got a VMMaker package in SqueakSource, those changes will need to
> be merged in. Also I'll need to figure out a better division between
> the plugin and the VM modifications. But merging into the VM should
> really wait until Exupery is a little more stable. Exupery itself is
> just a single Monticello package, that could stay on SqueakMap.
>
> Bryce
>
>
>
>