Am 06.09.2005 um 19:21 schrieb stéphane ducasse:

> I do not know and I did not want to dare :)
> I do not know the potential problem with MC....and I no time to  
> check that.
>
> Stef
> On 6 sept. 05, at 18:16, Chris Muller wrote:
>
>
>>> I created a new package 39Deprecated
>>> so if you deprecate a method in 39alpha please putting it into the
>>> category *39Deprecated.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Great idea.  Question:  why translate 3.9 to 39?  Could the  
>> category/package be
>> named *3.9Deprecated or even *3.9 deprecated?

By convention, categories are named using only alphanumeric  
characters and dashes. The same convention was "implicitely" carried  
over to package names.

- Bert -