Hi Sam

I agree with you
but, there is a but I would like to see OB really used, sped up,  and  
may be identifying the minimal
core that we can put in. For that people should use it and work on it.

Stef

>>>>>> "Andreas" == Andreas Raab <andreas.raab at gmx.de> writes:
>>>>>>
>
> Andreas> Fine with me as long as there is more than just words to this
> Andreas> statement. So why not do it the other way around? As long as
> Andreas> there is a browser in basic OB can be in full.
>
> If I understand correctly what Stéphane is saying, the old browser
> cannot easily serve as a base for extended features while OB can. If
> this is the case, I would also prefer to see a minimal version of OB
> in the base rather than the old browser, because it would mean that OB
> will have to be installed anyway as soon as any extended feature is
> needed such as a Traits browser.
>
>   Sam
> -- 
> Samuel Tardieu -- sam at rfc1149.net -- http://www.rfc1149.net/sam
>
>
>