FastSocketStream
Daniel Vainsencher
daniel.vainsencher at gmail.com
Sat Sep 10 23:03:47 UTC 2005
I think "Load" should be relabeled "Destructively Replace Current
Version", in bold red letters, then people will use it less.
At the moment "Load" sounds like something straight forward that is what
I want to do, while "Merge" sounds like something complicated that I'll
only want to do sometime later.
How about "Smart Load" instead of Merge, and "Replace" instead of
"Load"? in stead/in addition, might also be useful to have Load warn
someone when loading a version that is not a descendant of their current
version (and therefore merge might be smarter).
Daniel
Avi Bryant wrote:
> On Sep 10, 2005, at 2:34 PM, goran at krampe.se wrote:
>
>>
>> I should possibly have checked if there was a newer Network version -
>> but I don't really know how to do that (I mean, I can see there are
>> numerous newer versions of various packages - but how do I know which
>> configuration I should use?).
>
>
> I don't think we want to enforce a process where people always have to
> commit changes based on the latest version - the whole point of MC's
> merge semantics is that, unlike CVS & co, you don't need to do that. I
> think being as optimistic as possible about concurrent changes will go
> much more smoothly overall.
>
> But it does require that people use Merge instead of Load.
>
> Avi
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|