On Sep 18, 2005, at 8:48 PM, Doug Way wrote:
> "Upgrade" sounds pretty good for what it does.
>  I wonder if "Replace" might be a better term instead of "Revert" for
> the other operation.  "Revert" implies to me that you're going back  
> to a
> previous version, which is not necessarily true.  "Replace" can  
> mean an
> older or newer or just different version.  But "replace" makes it  
> pretty
> clear, I think, that you may be losing any local changes you may have
> made to the package... it's not too benign sounding.

+1