A Possibly Interesting Link
Dan Ingalls
Dan at SqueakLand.org
Thu Apr 6 09:09:52 UTC 2006
Andreas wrote...
>So here we go again:
>
>SqueakOnJava: 5,509,641 bytecodes/sec; 324,946 sends/sec
>SqueakOnC: 203,013,481 bytecodes/sec; 5,797,002 sends/sec
I'm surprised. As Avi reported, I get on my Mac:
SqueakOnJava: 9,211,283 bytecodes/sec; 509,641 sends/sec
SqueakOnC: 89,824,561 bytecodes/sec; 5,038,709 sends/sec
Actually, if I run the benchmarks in 3.8, I get more like 111M bytes/sec, so we've got a bit of an apples vs oranges problem (though nothing like Andreas's difference). To be truly fair, you'd have to run the mini image (that's what I do). I believe you can get that out of the jar, or I'll send it to you if you're interested.
Numbers like 20x to 50x to me indicate either a miserable Java or something else going on.
So I'm curious to see some other results.
- Dan
PS: I'm going to get some sleep now, though...
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|