>
> Thanks Stef for this kind mail,
> I'd rather see my work so far limited to minor bugs and  
> unconsistencies
> tracking as the labour of an ant in the squeak colony.

but ant step and important.
And may be from time to time a big rewrite :)

> But if that can be usefull to higher value added packages, i am happy.
>
> Squeak, if not the top cleanest smalltalk implementation, is not  
> bad at all.
> It is highly usable as proven by all these nice projects.
> I understand how vast the task of maintaining it is for (crazy?)  
> guys like
> you... So many thanks to all of you, and take the [GRR] as a trait  
> of humour,
> in no way something agressive.

Sure I could far more aggressive than that :)

> We should all support you in trying to make Squeak built on clean,  
> consistent
> and not too big basis. Doing so, we are helping ourselves for the  
> future.
>
> I put the OutOfScope Pb at http://bugs.impara.de/view.php?id=3448
> So maybe should any related discussion continue there.

Yes but this is really important to see the discussion also in the  
mailing-list.
Also do not hesitate to raise the issue or fixes that are pending to  
be harvested
because mantis is not transparent to me.

Stef
>
> Nicolas
>
>
>