ok :)

Stef

On 10 avr. 06, at 14:53, Bert Freudenberg wrote:

> It is "ready for inclusion" right now. When I wrote "we could" I  
> meant this very optional.
>
> - Bert -
>
> Am 10.04.2006 um 12:22 schrieb stéphane ducasse:
>
>> Ok so let us know when you think this is ready for inclusion.
>>
>> Stef
>> On 10 avr. 06, at 11:54, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>>
>>> Am 10.04.2006 um 12:19 schrieb Martin Wirblat:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> What about lf (10)?
>>>>> I don't know if that Unix-EndOfLine-Character finally entered  
>>>>> Squeak sources.
>>>>> But be prepared. -:)
>>>>
>>>> Right, especially because #isSeparator knows it already.
>>>
>>> No, in Squeak, carriage-return indicates the end of line. The  
>>> character scanner looks for it to start the next line. It does  
>>> not for a line-feed char.
>>>
>>> If a line-feed is in the source, I rather want to see it. There  
>>> are some actually in there, and they're hard to spot.
>>>
>>> We could install a more descriptive glyph than just a block  
>>> (think L over F or something), but some visible glyph I do want.
>>>
>>> - Bert -
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
>