Tony Garnock-Jones wrote:

> Dan Ingalls wrote:
> > I've been having fun with JavaScript, and thought folks would enjoy this
> > little tribute to tinyBenchmarks...
>
> I find it interesting that Squeak-on-Java runs faster than
> Javascript-in-Firefox for me, by these tinyBenchmarks. (Sends are faster
> by ~40%; bytecodes are slightly slower.)
>

    Actually, it is unfair to compare JavaScript to Squeak.

    To set the playing field level, one should compare JavsScript to
    SqueakScript, instead ;-)

    Cheers,

    SmallSqueak.

    P.S: BTW, does anyone know what happened to SmallScript?