Spoon progress 15 April 2005: inert method deletion details and
next steps
stéphane ducasse
ducasse at iam.unibe.ch
Mon Apr 17 15:40:44 UTC 2006
But indeed this would be an excellent incentive to get more tests.
And a good coverage tools...coming soon in prepreprealphaversion
Stef
> Which -I thought- the smiley at the end made clear. Sorry to see it
> doesn't. Yes, of course, that was a dogmatic overstatement, it was
> meant to be. But there is a grain of truth that's worthwhile to
> discuss - namely that, if anything, tests should be used as "a"
> primary source for imprinting (I'm putting the "a source" in quotes
> to point out that I don't mean it to be the sole source just in
> case someone else is inclined to interpret this as another dogmatic
> overstatement which in that case it's not supposed to be ;-) <--
> and please notice smiley here; this wasn't supposed to be taken too
> seriously ;-) <-- etc.
>
> Cheers,
> - Andreas
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|