Spoon progress 15 April 2005: inert method deletion details and next steps

stéphane ducasse ducasse at iam.unibe.ch
Mon Apr 17 15:40:44 UTC 2006


But indeed this would be an excellent incentive to get more tests.
And a good coverage tools...coming soon in prepreprealphaversion
Stef

> Which -I thought- the smiley at the end made clear. Sorry to see it  
> doesn't. Yes, of course, that was a dogmatic overstatement, it was  
> meant to be. But there is a grain of truth that's worthwhile to  
> discuss - namely that, if anything, tests should be used as "a"  
> primary source for imprinting (I'm putting the "a source" in quotes  
> to point out that I don't mean it to be the sole source just in  
> case someone else is inclined to interpret this as another dogmatic  
> overstatement which in that case it's not supposed to be ;-) <--  
> and please notice smiley here; this wasn't supposed to be taken too  
> seriously ;-) <-- etc.
>
> Cheers,
>   - Andreas
>




More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list