Board communication (was RE: Looking for good souls)
Chris Muller
chris at funkyobjects.org
Tue Apr 25 17:29:16 UTC 2006
"Formal constitution?" It's been 3+ years and a quarter-trillion
dollars+ in Iraq and still no formal constitution.
This whining is almost unbearable. They just formed man, they're
spread all over the world and, to top it off, they're a busy bunch of
people with regular jobs, big-time Squeak projects AND, now, this new
board responsibility.
How about cutting 'em a little slack time to get organized before using
such harsh words, huh?
--- Peter Crowther <Peter at ozzard.org> wrote:
> > From: Bert Freudenberg
> > Wouldn't the proper way of handling this the [be] board gathering
> > consensus and [...]
>
> It's a little difficult to tell, as the board *still* has no
> published
> way of working, there is (to my knowledge) no formal constitution of
> the
> Squeak Foundation despite it handling donations, and there appears
> not
> even to be any way of agreeing on what the board has done in order to
> present it at intervals to the wider community (witness Stef's and
> Craig's recent emails).
>
> If I'm wrong on any of these, I'd love to know; but it appears that
> the
> new board is no more functional than the last when it comes to
> communication.
>
> - Peter
>
>
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|