Looking for good souls

Dean_Swan at Mitel.COM Dean_Swan at Mitel.COM
Tue Apr 25 22:12:07 UTC 2006


I like this idea (for whatever my opinion may be worth).

        -Dean






Sean McGrath <sean at manybits.net>
Sent by: squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org
04/25/2006 04:05 PM
Please respond to The general-purpose Squeak developers list 

 
        To:     The general-purpose Squeak developers list 
<squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
        cc: 
        Subject:        Re: Looking for good souls


goran at krampe.se wrote:
[...]
> I also guess it will not in practice turn out harmful. Just note that
> one scenario (however unplausible) is that squeak-dev gets "weaker" in
> the sense that it misses out on all those
> Simple-And-Obvious-Things-That-We-Oldtimers-Don't-See-Anymore. Numerous
> frutiful discussions has started out with one of those "Sorry, but I
> just don't get it..."-questions from a complete beginner.

Quoting myself from
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2006-April/102982.html

Suppose a squeak-help list exists and any posts to it
were copied to squeak-dev with [help] prefixed to the subject,
and any replies from squeak-dev to [help] subjects were copied to
squeak-help. The dev list sees the help traffic, can provide assistance,
and gain "non-expert" perspective on the state of Squeak.
The help seekers are spared the "intimidating" traffic.
The [help] tags provide a filter handle for those that want one.
Possible? Desirable? ...

Sean McGrath



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20060425/b5fd45e8/attachment.htm


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list