Kernel.image update for 7052 and my vision of the next development

Pavel Krivanek squeak1 at continentalbrno.cz
Wed Aug 2 05:34:35 UTC 2006


On 8/2/06, Marcus Denker <denker at iam.unibe.ch> wrote:
>
> On 31.07.2006, at 22:29, Lic. Edgar J. De Cleene wrote:
>
> > Marcus Denker puso en su mail :
> >
> >> 7052 is broken... please don't use it. It should never have been
> >> released.
> >>
> >> 7048 is the latest working version.
> >>
> >>
> >>      Marcus
> > Huuh ? I have a working 7051 from some previous and update fror
> > servers.
> > I have some complains in the pass to 7052 , so I keep 7051.
> > Still don't blow ...
> > Any comments ? Is safer download 7048 again and forget this .image ?
>
> I'm planning to release an image based on 7048.... there is something
> completely wrong in 7049. It's the effect of doing the _ conversion on
> everything.
>
> This was a mistake to do, as we are in beta.
>
> So I will take 7048 and apply two or three fixes, and this then will
> be 3.9gamma
>
>    Marcus

I guess that sources of the kernel for 7052 and 7048 with next patches
will be at least very similar so it will no problem to correct mirrors
(I'm processing changes in assignments automatically). Thank you.

-- Pavel



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list