Hm.  I would advise against that.  I have been doing precisely that  
for the past year, and in the last couple of months found that  
SpamAssassin generated ridiculous quantities of false positives.   
(150 emails incorrectly classified as spam out of about 2500 spams.)

I have gone back to filtering on my mac Mail client.  More mail is  
popped, but I do not lose anything.

Nothing to do with squeak, but ...

Oscar

On Aug 18, 2006, at 16:42, Lex Spoon wrote:

> However, I should say that I think there is a better approach
> nowadays: filter on your mail server, using something like
> SpamAssassin.  The main reason is that you filter the spams out before
> you download them.  That way, you do not spend a lot of time
> downloading messages that are immediately tossed into the spam folder.