> Milan Zimmermann <milan.zimmermann at sympatico.ca> writes:
>>     1) "The Board" would start with defining what Squeak is - "Squeak" as a
>> small 
>> "SqueakCore" plus "Packages"  - Unfortunately I can only be intuitive here,
>> not saying I know what should be in "SqueakCore", likely it would be much
>> smaller than current Squeak, without Morphic, MVC (UI loadable, is that
>> possible?)

Giovanni Giorgi puso en su mail :

> I have proposed the SqueakCore ideas about two years ago, at the end of 2004
> See
>  http://people.squeakfoundation.org/article/41.html

This is SqueakKernel.image and Pavel is doing it for a while.

And Spoon is older and backed by Craig mastery.

My SqueakLight is the most tiny working set what have Morphic and could grow
and dated of 2003.
It's a beginner exercise about dependencies, what the several Squeak
"pieces" should like for reach a particular purpose, what was needed for
have any code originated in any Squeak could run, etc

I have at this time a working system, what could grow until understand
complicated .sar produced by regular 3.9.
Not only this, the same .sar could load in 3.9 or SqueakLight,
(Rompecabezas, LogicCircus,SqueakRailRoad) is running.
And I could have MorphicWrappers, MathMorphs, Monticello and friends
(including Monticello 2), Comanche + HttpView + Seaside, IRC.

What is needed is merge all in one killer SqueakCore , but at some time in
future this happen.

Edgar



	
	
		
__________________________________________________
Preguntá. Respondé. Descubrí.
Todo lo que querías saber, y lo que ni imaginabas,
está en Yahoo! Respuestas (Beta).
¡Probalo ya! 
http://www.yahoo.com.ar/respuestas