Haha.  Comming from the USA, the land of South Park, etc., I don't get 
offended by bloodthirsty or even shocking metaphors. :)

Yes, at some point I hope to get in a project big enough to test drive them, 
but it could be a while.  The closest thing I have seen (and what convinced 
me they were a good idea) was the description of how they are used with the 
Collection classes.  And I was under the impression this was in on 3.9?

>From: "Avi Bryant" <avi.bryant at gmail.com>
>Reply-To: avi at smallthought.com, The general-purpose Squeak developers 
>list<squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
>To: "The general-purpose Squeak developers 
>list"<squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
>Subject: Re: RE: Traits in use (was Re: Re: Squeak and Namespaces)
>Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 14:01:11 -0800
>
>On 12/1/06, J J <azreal1977 at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>In anger?
>
>I assume that expression comes from weapons - the difference between
>shooting at targets and shooting at people.  If you'll forgive the
>bloodthirsty metaphor, Traits makes some nice holes in paper
>silhouettes but I'm looking for the bodies.
>
>Avi
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get the latest Windows Live Messenger 8.1 Beta version. Join now. 
http://ideas.live.com