>From: goran at krampe.se
>Reply-To: The general-purpose Squeak developers 
>list<squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
>To: The general-purpose Squeak developers 
>list<squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
>Subject: RE: Squeak and Namespaces
>Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 23:14:23 +0200
>
>This "ugliness" notion is interesting since I personally think
>WAComponent is uglier than Component etc.
>

I find WAComponent and Component about the same, but WA::Component I find 
unappealing.

>I wonder what situation would give you "lots of conflicting names".
>AFAIK it is still pretty uncommon.
>

But in the solution I was responding to there were about 5 classes called 
"User".

>And again, even if there ARE 4 projects using say "Component" - it is
>not typically so that you happen to have all 4 in your image at the same
>time.
>

I'm confused here.  You mean all 4 in different namespaces?  Because if so, 
then I can give you an example.  I use Pier.  It pulls in Magritte and 
Seaside.  All three have a Component class.

_________________________________________________________________
Fixing up the home? Live Search can help 
http://imagine-windowslive.com/search/kits/default.aspx?kit=improve&locale=en-US&source=hmemailtaglinenov06&FORM=WLMTAG