Smalltalk bounty (Re: Squeak and Namespaces)

Michael van der Gulik mikevdg at gmail.com
Mon Dec 4 20:58:32 UTC 2006


On 12/5/06, J J <azreal1977 at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Did you look at the Gemstone stuff that I reposted?  It sounds like that
> system is close to your goals and it adds no new syntax (no dot syntax, no
> colons, just normal message sends afaik).  And I think the security of it
> is
> nice as well since it looks at the user compiling the code and then makes
> the link at compile time.  If you file out your changes and someone else
> files them in, it looks like that stuff would get rebuilt so the only
> security problem would be if you ship the byte codes directly, but I guess
> they probably have some solution for that.
>

Yes. I used that for inspiration on how to manage import lists. Effectively,
you get the same behaviour, but with hierarchical namespaces as an optional
extra.

Michael.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20061205/19a33bb7/attachment.htm


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list