> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Raab
> Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 2:23 AM
> 
> Brian Rice wrote:
> > It's time for me to backtrack again - I was wrong about this in the
> > general sense. There *is* a Dictionary mapping widgets to outputs. More
> > specifically, it maps the names of widgets to outputs, which is good
> > enough, and accessible via widgetAt:(ifAbsent:). I missed this because
> > the abstract ToolBuilder class doesn't have a dictionary instvar, just
> > the protocol, even if all concrete subclasses use it. Also, there is no
> > code making use of this feature, but it works fine.
> 
> If you want to push this up to ToolBuilder, feel free to send me a
> patch. Or even easier, get yourself an account on squeaksource.com and
> I'll add you as another developer.
> 
> > I am approaching the point where I may be able to write an article about
> > the use of ToolBuilder, probably on Squeak People or I may blog it
> > elsewhere.

How about weeklysqueak.wordpress.com?

Ron Teitelbaum