Chris Muller wrote:

> So that leaves versioning.  I have not seen a way for configurations to
> be "versioned," but since ancestry isn't really necessary for
> configurations maybe this really just amounts to me using my own naming
> scheme that includes an incrementing number..?

That's what we have been doing e.g. in the Sophie project.
Would be nice if MC configurations were a little smarter, but we are 
glad that we have them at all :-)

Michael