Martin Beck puso en su mail :

> Hi there,
> what kind of installable package files is the preferred one at the
> moment: .sar or .mcz? FYI, i want to automatically execute some code after
> loading the package. I found in a mailinglist, that in a .sar you can state
> this in install/postscript and in a .mcz you can use class-side startup:
> message. But .sars don't seem to be really used - am i right?
> 
> Regards,
> Martin

I always use .sar modified SARBuilder plus modified ArchiveViewer for having
some "app" deliver when I need more as just code.
See Rompecabezas.8.sar in SqueakMap to see how pack sound, picts,
morphs,etc.

Using the version info I could decide what was needed load for different
Squeak and the new version could load into Squeak 3.9/3.10, SqueakLight and
MinimalMorphic.


As SqueakSource don't let you put any different as .mcz, I have a modified
.mcz unpublished thing for doing the same "app" packaging thing and logic
for loading again from SqueakSource.


Edgar




	

	
		
__________________________________________________ 
Preguntá. Respondé. Descubrí. 
Todo lo que querías saber, y lo que ni imaginabas, 
está en Yahoo! Respuestas (Beta). 
¡Probalo ya! 
http://www.yahoo.com.ar/respuestas