Am 20.02.2006 um 23:50 schrieb Bernhard Pieber:

> Hi Todd,
>
> Todd Blanchard <tblanchard at mac.com> wrote:
>> My pet use would be to have a sort of mini-squeak source running in
>> my production seaside image.  IOW, my production image would just
>> look like a SS repository but saves would actually update the running
>> image.  Then I could push fixes directly from my development laptop
>> to my deployed application on my production server.
> This sounds like a useful use case. However, I don't understand why  
> you
> need full SqueakSource, i.e. the Web UI, for that. Wouldn't just
> Monticello and a file upload be enough?

Sure. But it would be *way cool* if you just open a regular web  
browser to update your image, including a nice UI :)

- Bert -