Candidate platforms?
Marcus Denker
denker at iam.unibe.ch
Tue Feb 21 19:00:42 UTC 2006
On 21.02.2006, at 09:50, stéphane ducasse wrote:
> I think that what I said counts also for marcus since we wrote the
> page together.
> But he can add a note.
>
Yes, indeed the list is quite complete... what I would likee to
stress again (you mentioned
it already): Coordination and communication.
I would like to see the projects / people that use Squeak to work
together, share their accomplishments
and have fun building a great system...
My personal view of Squeak is that it should be "the System to build
the next System with". I don't
know what that system of the future will look like, but I am sure we
can move one step
towards this system by making Squeak simpler to understand, easier to
modify and extend... better
meta-models, more late binding, better infrastructure, better tools,
a cleaner code base, modularity,
evolvability....
Ah, and in the subject there was the word platform: I would like
Squeak to be a platform, a basis for
many very different projects.
Marcus
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|