On 23.02.2006, at 20:19, Lic. Edgar J. De Cleene wrote:

> Cees De Groot puso en su mail :
>
>> Well... As a fraction of squeak-dev subscribers, we're at roughly
>> 10%... Maybe I'm a pessimist (unlikely) or maybe my expectations are
>> too high, but that's not really much. It's probably enough to declare
>> a usable election result, but I really do hope that next year, we can
>> make a leap to a substantially higher proportion of list subscribers
>> (which, I think, is maybe half of the community of squeak  
>> developers -
>> purely a guesstimate from the number of people I meet who are  
>> involved
>> in various open source projects but don't subscribe to the
>> accompanying mailing lists).
>
> Maybe if nobody wish reelection and votes counts for each person.
>
> Or if "masters" behave like you, gentle with people , good leading  
> and not
> trying all do his way.
>
> I vote only in the hope what new people and some of old correct the  
> crash
> course to the iceberg, what shy people don't say but thing is the  
> current
> 3.9 release.
What exactly do you not like with 3.9a? Would be really interesting  
to know.

You don't like Traits, ok. I accept that. Do you have had any direct  
negative
consequences due to Traits in 3.9a? Which have that been?

Are there any other problems in 3.9a? Did you do a bug-report abou them?

It is of course the decision of the new SqF board what to do with  
3.9a, if the
board decides that it is complete crap, they should throw it away.

      Marcus