I agree.  Extending the deadline in this case is a good choice.
Inclusiveness is preferable.

Ken

On Thu, 2006-02-23 at 19:01 -0500, Brent Vukmer wrote:
> Hey folks.  I got emails from a couple of folks today asking for
> re-sends for their voter invitation.  Since I don't have webmail
> access during the day, I was only able to act on those requests now
> (10 minutes before the voting deadline).
> 
> I'm going to extend the voting deadline by three hours in an attempt
> to give those folks time to vote. The deadline will now be Friday
> February 24th 0300 UTC.  I hope that doesn't ruffle anyone's feathers.
>  I would rather err on the side of being flexible this first time
> around.
> 
> This is a wonderful opportunity for all you folks who haven't voted
> yet!  Get to it! :)
> 
> The deadline is now Friday February 24th 0300 UTC.
> Total authorized voters: 347
> Actual votes cast so far: 154
> 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20060223/c93c71ef/attachment.pgp