Yup, I sure did. Mostly because I was concerned about the IP aspects. 
But keep in mind that my rant was a meta rant and (in this case) pointed 
at using the name Pragma where one only has to look at 
http://www.google.com/search?q=define:+pragma to see that pragma 
describes not what these annotations are being used for and that 
therefore the "consistency" argument is really a "compatibility" 
argument, e.g., VW uses that bad name so we have to use the same bad 
name. And there is really no point in that unless you want to write a VW 
clone.

Cheers,
   - Andreas

Lukas Renggli wrote:
> Andreas, did you have a look at the implementation? It is not an 1:1,
> it just supports the same protocol.
> 
> Lukas
> 
> --
> Lukas Renggli
> http://www.lukas-renggli.ch
> 
>