On Jan 4, 2006, at 6:39 AM, David Shaffer wrote:

> Each of the comparison server technologies was capable of  
> responding sub
> millisecond even under loads which correspond to Kom's maximum.   
> Each of
> the comparison server technologies could handle over 300 requests per
> second and in most cases well beyond that.  The net effect (IN MY
> OPINION) is that Squeak web servers feel noticably sluggish even under
> no load.  Most people I've talked to say the same thing.  I've heard
> claims about "saturating a 10Mb/s network"...let me just say that  
> under
> load with the current VM latency has a much larger effect on
> responsiveness and robustness than throughput.

Out of curiosity, how does VW compare?

Avi