I can't figure what does the MessageTally class?

On 1/17/06, stéphane ducasse <ducasse at iam.unibe.ch> wrote:
>
> Diego
>
> I suggest you to have a look at the testrunner of lukas, Because it
> is real fast and much more usable.
> Available in the latest 3.9
>
> stef
>
> On 17 janv. 06, at 15:12, Diego Fernandez wrote:
>
> > Thanks Lucas, I will try it.
> > Yesterday I started to do the code coverage tool using "method
> > wrappers", it worked :)
> >
> > But my unit tests of the coverage tool some times fails and some
> > times pass (I think that is caused by some initialization made by
> > the method wrappers).
> > Anyway.. I think that tomorrow I'm going to upload the first
> > version of the package to SqueakMap.
> >
> > On 1/17/06, Lukas Renggli < renggli at gmail.com> wrote:> Hi, is there
> > any tool to do code coverage? (at method level is enough, i
> > > want to do something to check that unit test cover all the methods)
> >
> > You might want to try something like that in any Squeak image:
> >
> > tallies := IdentityDictionary new.
> > prev := [ MAFileModelTest suite run ].
> > thisContext sender
> >         runSimulated: prev
> >         contextAtEachStep: [ :curr |
> >                 curr == prev ifFalse: [
> >                         (tallies
> >                                 at: curr receiver
> >                                 ifAbsentPut: [ Set new ])
> >                                         add: curr selector ].
> >                         prev := curr ] ].
> >
> > There are some bugs in the simulator that prevent you from running
> > tests  that containing #should:raise: and #shouldnt:raise:, else this
> > technique works very well and requires no additional package.
> >
> > Lukas
> >
> > --
> > Lukas Renggli
> > http://www.lukas-renggli.ch
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20060117/68f21bed/attachment.htm