Ok, after checking the squeak-dev.mbox.gz file,

Message-ID for one problematic mail (From blake at kingdomrpg.com Mon Jan
09 07:55:26 2006) is:

Message-ID: <op.s23pmazvzb486t at wynorski> 

which is maybe not conventional ?

Another one (From ken at kencausey.com Mon Jan 09 06:00:00 2006)
concerning Squeak Chat has no Message-ID field at all (same for the
others mails about Squeak Chat), so I guess that this kind of message
are broken (maybe due to the automatic script which does not send a
standard mail ??).

Cheers,
Samir

Ken Causey <ken at kencausey.com> writes:

> I see nothing wrong with the messages as I provided them to Lars.  Feel
> free to check it out yourself at
>
> http://discuss.squeakfoundation.org/squeak-dev.mbox.gz
>
> (Warning to anyone considering downloading this file - I don't recommend
> it as it is approximately 109MB in size and doesn't contain anything you
> can't already find at
>
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/
>
> and is in fact a few days behind at this point.)
>
> This file is just a copy of the mbox file created and used by Mailman
> and I can't see why it would have caused a problem.
>
> Ken
>
> On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 00:18 +0100, Samir Saidani wrote:
>> Not exactly, (I think !), it seems that they are out of order on the
>> news server as well, and that these messages are intrinsically broken
>> (message-ID broken).
>> 
>> Petr <petr at madnetwork.org> writes:
>> 
>> > Gmane FAQ:
>> > Why are all the articles out of order after doing an import?
>> > They aren't on the news server. On the web server they'll remain out
>> > of order until weaverd has rethreaded them, which'll happen six months
>> > later.
>> > Is it the problem you are referring to?
>> >
>> > Petr
>> >
>> > Samir Saidani wrote:
>> >> Hi !
>> >> I'm using intensively the squeak gmane archive through my mail
>> >> reader,
>> >> and noticed that all the threads are now broken, the result is
>> >> unfortunately not readable. Is it possible to fix it ? Or maybe the
>> >> problem was already mentionned ? I guess that it is due to the recent
>> >> addition of older archived mails !
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Samir
>> >>
>>