Yes, the new tools are indeed not as complete as those that existed in 
the prototype, but they do include the hardest features to implement. 
What does exist shows how to extend the Omnibrowser in the right 
direction, and the OB is a pleasure to extend, once you get into it.

Daniel

Adrian Lienhard wrote:
> Daniel Vainsencher and Tom Koenig worked on a new Traits browser based 
> on OmniBrowser (and also one that integrated the requires algorithm by 
> Nathanael). See http://squeaksource.com/TraitsOmniBrowser.html
>
> Adrian
>
> On Jun 4, 2006, at 17:39 , Philippe Marschall wrote:
>
>> OmniBrowser aka "Image Browser". But it has still some rough edges
>> when it comes to traits and is not close to the described tools.
>>
>> Philippe
>>
>> 2006/6/4, danil osipchuk <danil at mtsnet.ru>:
>>> Hi, all
>>>
>>> Which browser one should use with traits implementation found in 
>>> current
>>> 3.9beta? Default tools in 3.9 don't look as handy as those described in
>>> white-papers (in this one for example:
>>> http://www.iam.unibe.ch/~schaerli/smalltalk/traits/traitsPrototype.htm
>>> ). May be there are some preferences to enable or package for download?
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>     Danil
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>