Thanks
Re test count: Just went back to replicate and itlooks like I must have had
some other test category selected when I was testing.
Re trait used by, good idea.  I'll put that on the to-do list.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org [mailto:squeak-dev-
> bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org] On Behalf Of Philippe Marschall
> Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 1:27 PM
> To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list
> Subject: Re: Traits Browser Availablity
> 
> This is really cool.
> 
> I get
> 126 run, 118 passes, 0 expected failures, 3 failures, 5 errors, 0
> unexpected passes
> 
> One thing I'd really like to see is a way to find all the places where
> a trait is used. A simple popup of a broser like 'browse references'
> would already be enough.
> 
> Cheers
> Philippe
> 
> 2006/6/19, Thomas Koenig <tomkoenig at mindspring.com>:
> > In 3.9b 7033, using Monticello browser, from the
> > http://monticello.wiresong.ca/ob/  repository, load OB-Tests-Core-
> cwp.1.mcz
> > (This will allow you to run the associated s-unit tests for OmniBrowser
> and
> > is a prereq to run the tests for Trait Structure Browser)
> >
> > And from the http://kilana.unibe.ch:8888/TraitsOmniBrowser  repository,
> load
> > TraitsOmniBrowser-tlk.38.mcz
> >
> > If you select and run OB-Tests-Core and TraitsOmniBrowser-Test test in
> > TestRunner, it should run 173 tests with 165 passing. The 3 failures and
> 5
> > errors appear in OB-Tests-Core w/o the Trait Structure Browser changes.
> If
> > you get different results then I've probably failed to classify some
> > overridden method a *TraitsOmniBrowser.
> >
> > In a work space, do
> > OBTraitStructureBrowser open
> >
> > To see the difference between this browser and the default
> SystemBrowser, do
> > a find on Behavior, and explore the treatment of trait compositions and
> the
> > virtual method categories.
> >
> > OBTraitStructureBrowser seems to be working as far as it goes.  We still
> > need to add a fair bit of functionality from Browser (e.g. you can't do
> a
> > find on a Trait) and the Traits Browser as described in the papers (e.g,
> no
> > easy way to change a method in the trait versus in the using class).
> This
> > version is probably worth others trying.  The latest version is mine,
> but of
> > course Adrian and Daniel have done all the heavy lifting.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > could we use your code as an example in the OB paper we are writing?
> > > Does it load in latest 3.9
> >
> >
> > > On 4 juin 06, at 23:36, Daniel Vainsencher wrote:
> > > > Yes, the new tools are indeed not as complete as those that existed
> > > > in the prototype, but they do include the hardest features to
> > > > implement. What does exist shows how to extend the Omnibrowser in
> > > > the right direction, and the OB is a pleasure to extend, once you
> > > > get into it.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Adrian Lienhard wrote:
> > > >> Daniel Vainsencher and Tom Koenig worked on a new Traits browser
> > > >> based on OmniBrowser (and also one that integrated the requires
> > > >> algorithm by Nathanael). See http://squeaksource.com/
> > > >> TraitsOmniBrowser.html
> > > >>
> > > >> On Jun 4, 2006, at 17:39 , Philippe Marschall wrote:
> > > >>> OmniBrowser aka "Image Browser". But it has still some rough edges
> > > >>> when it comes to traits and is not close to the described tools.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> 2006/6/4, danil osipchuk <danil at mtsnet.ru>:
> > > >>>> Which browser one should use with traits implementation found in
> > > >>>> current
> > > >>>> 3.9beta? Default tools in 3.9 don't look as handy as those
> > > >>>> described in
> > > >>>> white-papers (in this one for example:
> > > >>>> http://www.iam.unibe.ch/~schaerli/smalltalk/traits/
> > > >>>> traitsPrototype.htm
> > > >>>> ). May be there are some preferences to enable or package for
> > > >>>> download?
> >
> >
> >
> >