Proposal for a Squeak migration meeting

Hilaire Fernandes hilaire at ext.cri74.org
Thu Jun 22 18:40:21 UTC 2006



stéphane ducasse a écrit :
>>>
>>> Tim you are pointing a very important point. After the announce of  the
>>> change to APSL2.0 of Squeak1.1, we have to ask ourself which part of
>>> {Squeak3.8}\{Squeak1.1} can be relicensed and probably much more
>>> important which part cannot be relicensed.
>>
>>
>> I very much doubt that there are any parts that cannot be  relicensed,
>> if in fact it is even really neccesary. What would be  wrong with
>> taking the position that the original squeak license  (which is quite
>> adequately free in my opinion) has been rescinded  and replaced by the
>> APSL? I think that would be compatible with the  SqL clause about
>> relicensing so long as it is no less protective of  Apple,  since
>> after all they have chosen this new license. Surely  *any* code
>> released under SqL can be declared as relicensed?
> 
> 
> you see tim this what I would like to know from the laywer we  contacted
> ( do not remember his name).

Did you get any feedback from the laywer?
How can we make progress regarding this proposal?

Hilaire



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list