Colin,

Are you making use of the OminBrowser category of the Squeak Packages
project at http://bugs.impara.de/ ?  If so, can I set you as the
developer for that category so you will automatically get email any time
a new issue is categorized under it?  If not, I guess I need to remove
that category and we need to somehow direct people to send their issues
elsewhere.

Thanks,

Ken

On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 14:34 -0500, Colin Putney wrote:
> On Mar 2, 2006, at 11:43 AM, Lukas Renggli wrote:
> 
> >> Please, forgive me if it is not the right way to submit changes and
> >> enhancement... Feel free to point me a _short_ and concise
> >> description about how to submit a fix, if I got it completely wrong.
> >
> > I asked the same question several times as well and I still wonder
> > where to publish fixes to OmniBrowser?
> >
> > I would prefer to have a public Monticello repository somewhere, where
> > I could publish a couple of fixes and some cool enhancements
> > (inspector framework based on OmniBrowser) that I have ready.
> 
> Cool!
> 
> Mailing me a change set or Monticello version is a perfectly good way  
> to contribute, no worries. Another way would be to mail me the URL of  
> a public Monticello repository I can pull the versions from. My own  
> work is always available from my public repository at:
> 
> http://monticello.wiresong.ca/ob/
> 
> I do plan to provide public commit access to the "official"  
> OmniBrowser repository in the near future, but it might take a little  
> while to sort out the security issues. Hang in there.
> 
> Thanks for your contributions, guys.
> 
> Colin
> 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20060302/d322d1b0/attachment.pgp