Stef,

1) Squeak Foundation Legal Entity Formation
2) Stabilization of current implementation 3.9a including focusing on issues
that separate Squeak, SqueakLand, wxSqueak, Tweak, Croquet, Seaside and
Spoon, and actively support and promote all.
3) Focus on issues that remain with Traits.
4) Work on and identify issues that prevent the business community from
adopting squeak.
5) Produce a better framework for attracting web development, including
courting existing large Hosting companies to support squeak and offer it for
end user applications, and developing web frameworks control panels that
automatically integrate and install developed applications, to encourage
larger adoption of squeak.  Also developing end user applications,
integration with control panels, and demo sites for each, all in a single
easy find location.
6) Support the efforts of the cryptography group as we develop cryptography
frameworks, including the financial support for the Cryptographic Module
Validation Program (CMVP) through the OpenSSL Federal Information Processing
Standard (FIPS) Certification Process which we believe will go a long way to
encourage business to adopt Squeak.
7) Complete the network integration of Flow, and begin supporting more
business protocols: ASN.1, XL7, NCPDP, X.12, EDI ... 

I think we can complete these goals this year and move on to more next year!
(including working on license issues)

Ron Teitelbaum
President / Principal Software Engineer
US Medical Record Specialists
Ron at USMedRec.com 
Squeak Cryptography Team Leader
Squeak News Team Member

> -----Original Message-----
> From: squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org [mailto:squeak-dev-
> bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org] On Behalf Of stéphane ducasse
> Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 4:01 PM
> To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list
> Subject: SqF feedback
> 
> Hi
> 
> I'm reposting this email since I have the impression that the point
> was lost in its original thread.
> 
> ...
> 	- Normally after election, politicians do not really listen anymore
> and
> 	I would like to do the inverse. I would really like to know what you
> expect
> 	or would like to see put in place. We have some ideas (bounty
> system, better process)
> 	and I will really listen what the new boarders want to do (I'm even
> eager to see that :)).
> 
> We do not have the monopole of good ideas,
> so if you have some points that you would like to see happening
> please mention it.
> 
> Stef
> 
> 
>