I agree but if the look of squeak would be better (cf like the henrik  
one for example) then we will be cooler
and smarter suddenly. Look at the web site and compare to the old  
one. Same here, so if squeak
wants to attract people the look is important.

Look is important. Nobody would buy a bad looking iPod with a crappy  
interface at that price :)

Stef

On 21 mars 06, at 14:08, Bert Freudenberg wrote:

> Sure. Just leave the artwork to an artist :)
>
> That's what we do for our products, anyway. People always seem  
> surprised that "this is Squeak?!" - why, yes, sure, it's just  
> pixels on the screen. BitBlt doesn't particularly care what it's  
> shoving around ;)
>
> In the case of DabbleDB of course it's not BitBlt but a browser  
> rendering using HTML+CSS, and I'm pretty sure it's not by chance  
> that they took the video on Mac OS X, in Safari (which can be seen  
> in one frame of the video), using Apple-designed widgets, to give  
> it the best possible look.
>
> I wonder why people equate the Squeak dev-tools look with the final  
> application. I mean, many people build shiny apps in, say, Emacs,  
> but nobody seems surprised the result doesn't look like Emacs ...
>
> - Bert -
>
> Am 21.03.2006 um 12:40 schrieb Lord ZealoN:
>
>> Is pretty.
>>
>> 2006/3/21, Bert Freudenberg <bert at impara.de>: Squeak and Seaside,  
>> yes.
>>
>> - Bert -
>>
>> Am 21.03.2006 um 12:17 schrieb Lord ZealoN:
>>
>> > This app is under squeak?
>> >
>> > 2006/3/21, Markus Gaelli <gaelli at emergent.de>: http://dabbledb.com/
>> > utr/
>> >
>> > Thanks Avi and Andrew.
>> > Good luck with that killer app!
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> >
>> > Markus
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>