> That shouldn't have happened, at least not with my automatic  
> conversion procedure, which carefully does not touch methods that  
> contain underscore in literals. I hope. Of course, when going over  
> the remaining methods manually these might have slipped in.

bert this is may be my fault.

> What would be helpful in this case is if we had a "pretty printed  
> diff" in Monticello so one could see the actual changes undisturbed  
> by cosmetic modifications. I found it so cumbersome to merge 3.9  
> packages with my own versions that I gave up on it.

Me too and the diff makes often really difficult for me to read the  
changes.
>
> Any takers? :)

I hope that soon we will have a nice pretty printer so it may help us  
there.
>
> - Bert -
>
>