I'm curious what you mean.  I was just assuming that we would have a
directory per project where each project would then be responsible for
their own sub-tree structure.  Does that sound overly messy to you?
Perhaps I don't understand your point.

Ken

On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 11:57 -0700, tim Rowledge wrote:
> One amongst us that has experience with svn might like to think a bit  
> about setting up a basic directory tree in the svn server so that we  
> have some hope of it being tidy.
> 
> 
> tim
> --
> tim Rowledge; tim at rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
> Useful random insult:- Teflon brain -- nothing sticks.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20060509/a3edb62f/attachment.pgp