yes

On 17 mai 06, at 19:54, nicolas cellier wrote:

>
> ValueHolder does not respond to #value #value:
>
> Instead it responds to #contents #contents:
>
> Apart that it is not named ContentHolder, it's usefull to have this  
> object
> responding to #value so that it can be used in place of Blocks,  
> like in VW
>
> Anyone agree?
>
>