My small suggestions is to switch/rewrite as much as we can to the new
license.
The reasoning is, to better server the other communities whom we trying to
invite to our world.


> > Hi all--
> >
> >       Thanks to long-running efforts by folks at Viewpoints Research
> > Institute, Apple Computer and elsewhere, Apple has given Viewpoints
> > permission to make a release of the original public Squeak system using
> > the Apple Public Source License[1].
> >
> >       Squeak 1.1, with an APSL2 license, is available here:
> >
> >       http://squeakland.org/installers/Squeak1.1-APSL.zip
> >
> >       The Squeak Foundation board would like to thank the above groups
> for
> > making this happen, and everyone else for being so patient!
> >
> >       And now we live in interesting times. This only applies to the
> original
> > release of Squeak (version 1.1 of 23 September 1996); we now have a
> > choice between APSL2 and the original Squeak License[2] for that
> > release. We need to decide what to do about subsequent code, and code
> > written by third parties. We might choose to rewrite some things so as
> > to create a better licensing situation. We probably want to have a
> > policy whereby contributors agree to grant a particular license to their
> > work explicitly before we can accept it.
> >
> >       How shall we proceed with future releases of Squeak? Let's discuss
> it.
> >
> >
> >       thanks again,
> >       your Squeak Foundation board
> >
> > [1] http://www.opensource.apple.com/apsl/2.0.txt
> > [2] http://www.squeak.org/SqueakLicense
> >
> --
> ==========================================
> Diego Gomez Deck
> ------------------------------------------
> http://www.consultar.com/DiegoGomezDeck/
> http://diegogomezdeck.blogspot.com/
> http://smalltalk.consultar.com/
> ==========================================
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20060524/51ef98ac/attachment.htm