I am standing by Juan's proposal,
do you? (was Re: Removing Etoys, Morphic and other friends)
bryce at kampjes.demon.co.uk
Wed Nov 1 00:13:42 UTC 2006
Adrian Lienhard writes:
> I wonder, what is the opinion of the Squeakland people?
> The arguments for keeping etoys in Squeak seem even weaker to me if
> the actual stakeholders do not state "yes, this is important for us
> because we plan to keep our Squeakland fork in sync with future
> Squeak versions". If this is not the case it does not make sense to
> have a non maintained version in the main image (and that is what we
> have now). If there are people willing to remove etoys we should not
> miss the opportunity!
A cleaner smaller Morphic helps for all non-eToy's uses. Unless eToys
is actively maintained in the squeak-dev images then it's better to
remove it and point eToys users to the "good" versions.
Letting it rot will create confusion.
More information about the Squeak-dev