I am standing by Juan's proposal, do you?

Juan Vuletich jmvsqueak at uolsinectis.com.ar
Wed Nov 1 03:05:53 UTC 2006

Hi Folks,

I apologize for not answering each message, but I can't get mail 
(problems @dc.uba.ar). So, if anybody sent me personal mail today, most 
likely I lost it. Please resend to this adress.

First of all, Goran, thank you for your support.

I don't think this needs much further discussion. But I'd like to know 
the board's opinion (or at least, the board member's one).

To Ron, you asked 'A question for Juan, can your Morphic 3.0 
advancements be applied to Tweak?'. I don't know. You also said 'I would 
like to see Juan and other Squeak developers work towards getting Tweak 
ready and include it in Squeak'. Do you think it is of any use each one 
of us to start saying what we would like the others to work on? Come on! 
Nobody gets paid here. Each one of us works on whatever we want!

To *Jimmie, wrt '*and I would love to see some pre-built images which 
target certain user groups, eToys, business apps, web server, etc. I 
believe Spoon, Pavel & Juan, offer hope for such a future'. I agree with 
you. Thanks.

To Bill, I agree that floats and general transformations are not the 
best solution for everything. Your point about PDAs is specially valid. 
Currently Morphic 3.0 is not a reasonable alternative to replace Morphic 
2.0. But maybe some day. Wrt to 'killing the pixel'. The pixel is dying 
anyway. Postcript, pdf, display postcript, aqua, vista, see where the 
path goes?

To Francisco, Interesting experiment!

Juan Vuletich

More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list