I am standing by Juan's proposal, do you?
jmvsqueak at uolsinectis.com.ar
Wed Nov 1 03:05:53 UTC 2006
I apologize for not answering each message, but I can't get mail
(problems @dc.uba.ar). So, if anybody sent me personal mail today, most
likely I lost it. Please resend to this adress.
First of all, Goran, thank you for your support.
I don't think this needs much further discussion. But I'd like to know
the board's opinion (or at least, the board member's one).
To Ron, you asked 'A question for Juan, can your Morphic 3.0
advancements be applied to Tweak?'. I don't know. You also said 'I would
like to see Juan and other Squeak developers work towards getting Tweak
ready and include it in Squeak'. Do you think it is of any use each one
of us to start saying what we would like the others to work on? Come on!
Nobody gets paid here. Each one of us works on whatever we want!
To *Jimmie, wrt '*and I would love to see some pre-built images which
target certain user groups, eToys, business apps, web server, etc. I
believe Spoon, Pavel & Juan, offer hope for such a future'. I agree with
To Bill, I agree that floats and general transformations are not the
best solution for everything. Your point about PDAs is specially valid.
Currently Morphic 3.0 is not a reasonable alternative to replace Morphic
2.0. But maybe some day. Wrt to 'killing the pixel'. The pixel is dying
anyway. Postcript, pdf, display postcript, aqua, vista, see where the
To Francisco, Interesting experiment!
More information about the Squeak-dev