Broken SqueakSource?

David T. Lewis lewis at
Mon Nov 20 14:20:35 UTC 2006

On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 10:56:25AM -0300, Edgar J. De Cleene wrote:
> David T. Lewis puso en su mail :
> > On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 03:43:41PM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> >> What do you mean? There already are pre/post load/unload scripts in
> >> PackageInfo, usable by MC.
> > 
> > OK, I'm completely clueless. I'm looking at a 3.9 image, and I see
> > nothing that looks like "pre/post load/unload scripts" in PackageInfo
> > or MC, and certainly nothing that could serve as a replacement for
> > a SAR. What am I missing?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Dave
> > 
> All this begins when Pavel say what hitting Scripts button on Monticello
> Browser gives the attached walkback.
> I always use .sar for complex code and extra things like picts, sound, etc
> and have experience in load this in different version .images (see
> Rompecabezas.8.sar for a complex "micro app" what figures what load for
> work)
> I should mess something and found many are "in progress", as no implemented
> or no clues or how could manage this.
> My dirty solution works , until now, only via drag and drop and tell SAR
> install.
> Still guessing how manage the fact what sometimes in reduced images you
> should load something what image lacks BEFORE Monticello owns logic.
> Take MinimalMorphic and the .cs and .mcz I send for test what works , but
> need refining...
Thanks Edgar, I will continue to use .sar files.


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list