philippe.marschall at gmail.com
Mon Nov 20 21:06:36 UTC 2006
2006/11/20, Ron Teitelbaum <Ron at usmedrec.com>:
> I had to load some of Bert's changes to get Monticello Configurations
> working. It would be really nice if we could get all these changes together
> into a 3.9 image somehow. I posted the changes to Mantis. I have no idea
> how people use Monticello without using Monticello Configurations! (I'd be
> completely lost without it)
There is also:
> Ron Teitelbaum
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org [mailto:squeak-dev-
> > bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org] On Behalf Of David T. Lewis
> > Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 10:34 AM
> > To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list
> > Subject: Re: Broken SqueakSource?
> > On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 03:53:40PM +0100, Philippe Marschall wrote:
> > > 2006/11/20, David T. Lewis <lewis at mail.msen.com>:
> > > >
> > > >OK, I'm completely clueless. I'm looking at a 3.9 image, and I see
> > > >nothing that looks like "pre/post load/unload scripts" in PackageInfo
> > > >or MC, and certainly nothing that could serve as a replacement for
> > > >a SAR. What am I missing?
> > >
> > > As Edgar said, use the "Scripts" button of the Monticello browser.
> > > This doesn't work with the stock 3.9 PackageInfo but should work fine
> > > in a 3.8 image, with a Monticello from Impara and a PackageInfo from
> > > Impara. For 3.9 the Impara changes need to be packported.
> > Thanks, the Impara sources is the part I was missing.
> > Dave
More information about the Squeak-dev